RECENT POSTS

THOUSANDS OF INELIGIBLE VOTER REGISTRATIONS FOUND
MIGRANTS SURGE AT U.S. AIRPORTS
NATO CHANGING ITS MIND RE HELPING TRUMP
CHINESE INTERFERENCE IN OUR ELECTIONS?
VIDEO – SUNDAY MORNING FUTURES- MARIA BARTIROMO – MARCH 15, 2026
TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME: THE DANGER OF HATRED CLOUDING PERCEPTION
VIDEO – VOTER FRAUD IN GEORGIA
2 VIDEOS – MUSLIMS IN AMERICA

RECOMMENDED

SITES

CHINESE INTERFERENCE IN OUR ELECTIONS?

Remember how those who believed  that there was fraud in the 2020 election were denounced ?  Nancy

Mail?url=https%3A%2F%2Feotrx.substackcdn.com%2Fopen%3Ftoken%3DeyJtIjoiPDIwMjYwMzE3MTU0NDU3LjMuZDdhYzIzY2JmYTYxMzYyMEBtZzIuc3Vic3RhY2suY29tPiIsInUiOjQ1OTM2NTA4LCJyIjoiQ2xhcmtuYUBhb2wuY29tIiwiZCI6Im1nMi5zdWJzdGFjay5jb20iLCJwIjoxOTEyNjE5MDUsInQiOiJuZXdzbGV0dGVyIiwiYSI6ImV2ZXJ5b25lIiwicyI6NzQ2NTgwLCJjIjoicG9zdCIsImYiOnRydWUsInBvc2l0aW9uIjoidG9wIiwiaWF0IjoxNzczNzYyMzA4LCJleHAiOjE3NzYzNTQzMDgsImlzcyI6InB1Yi0wIiwic3ViIjoiZW8ifQ

John Solomon is reporting on previously suppressed information indicating that, as early as 2020, we knew the Chinese were trying to interfere in our elections and that this intelligence was covered up.
͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­

 

Jaw-Dropping Clip of Donald Trump Telling Host His Plan for Iran in 1980 Goes Viral! – Israel Unwired

Dave Rubin is exactly right that Donald Trump – back in 1980 – when he was in his 30’s understood what so many across the United States of America understand instinctively – the world does not respect weakness. It really is as simple as that.

Donald Trump – then and now – is in no way a warmonger. But he is most definitely someone willing to give the order to pull the trigger – with one caveat. He refuses to allow the United States of America to get swallowed into a black hole of an endless war.

Remember that Donald Trump came of age during the time of the Vietnam War. Like so many other baby boomers, he was profoundly impacted by that war – whether or not he supported it. The war was a tragedy that shattered much of the image of the United States – both within the United States and across the world.

But Donald Trump does not believe in throwing out the baby with the bathwater. And he is wise enough to know that not every conflict can be solved with surgical strikes – such as the phenomenal raid and decapitation of Maduro in Venezuela.

In truth, President Trump has been a master at both leading the United States and being in tune with the general consensus of what the vast majority of the United States supports – a strong and proud United States that does not get embroiled in foreign conflicts.

 

TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME: THE DANGER OF HATRED CLOUDING PERCEPTION

 

‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’: The Danger of Hatred Clouding Perception

Dr. Majid Rafizadeh, is a political scientist, Harvard-educated analyst, and board member of Harvard International Review. He has authored several books on the US foreign policy. He can be reached at dr.rafizadeh@post.harvard.edu

March 14, 2026 
  • In the end, the greatest danger of this mindset is not simply unfair criticism of a president. The deeper problem is that it weakens the ability of society to confront serious threats. When political hatred becomes so intense that it overrides basic judgment, it becomes difficult to distinguish between legitimate criticism and reflexive opposition. Perception of reality itself is broken.
  • At a moment when the world faces overwhelming security challenges – such as from China – currently developing new deadly pathogens for biowarfare and autonomous robots programmed to kill — and authoritarian regimes that continue to threaten both their own populations and what they regard as their enemies — denial and blindness carry serious risks.
  • If political discourse becomes so polarized that people can no longer recognize the nature of regimes that repress their own citizens and openly threaten the United States and the Free World, the problem is far larger than any single president. It becomes a crisis that can only be addressed when people step outside their partisan bubbles and confront reality as it truly is.
  • If one steps back from the daily noise of partisan bickering and looks at the broader picture in the United States today, some media outlets and political figures appear so consumed by hostility toward the current president that they seem incapable of evaluating events rationally.Their reaction to almost anything he does appears automatic and reflexive. This situation, often described as “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” has reached such an extreme level that at times these voices appear to be siding — whether intentionally or not — with America’s enemies such as the Chinese Communist Party, or the Iranian regime, which, since its inception in 1979, has openly been at war with the United States and for decades has been described by American officials across both political parties as the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism 39 years in a row.
  • The result is a political discourse that seems disconnected from what is right or wrong, but simply whether something was done by President Donald J. Trump.This disagreement has gone far beyond normal political discord. In any healthy democracy, political leaders and policies can and should be debated and criticized. What we are witnessing now in some corners of the political and media landscape, however, appears to have crossed over into something closer to emotional obsession than rational debate. It is as if the guiding principle has become: if Trump does something, it must automatically be wrong. The logic and context behind the action become irrelevant. Instead of asking whether confronting a hostile regime might serve American interests or international security, the reaction becomes instant opposition, regardless of the circumstances or the stakes involved.
  • The Iranian regime, for instance, has for decades openly defined itself through hostility toward the United States and its allies. Its leaders have repeatedly chanted “Death to America” (“The Great Satan”) and “Death to Israel” (“The Little Satan”), slogans that are not merely rhetorical flourishes but actual central elements of the regime’s ideological identity. Iranian leaders, starting with the founder of the Islamic Republic, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, have openly called for the obliteration of Israel and have supported armed groups across the Middle East that target both Israelis and Americans.Since 1984, the US government — under both Republican and Democrat administrations — has officially designated Iran as a State Sponsor of Terrorism for its support of terrorist organizations such as Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, Hamas, and the Houthis; its involvement in attacks across the region and attempted attacks abroad, including involvement in the 9/11 attacks and at least two attempted assassinations on Trump, as well as targeting senior US officials for assasination in his first term.
  • Iran’s regime has killed countless Americans, and continues to pursue policies designed to weaken American influence in the Middle East. It is a regime that has repeatedly demonstrated hostility toward the United States and its allies.Yet when Trump took a hard stance against Tehran, instead of focusing on the nature of the Iranian regime itself, some critics appeared to focus exclusively on the identity of the president who was confronting it. The issue became less about Iran and more about Trump. His actions, rather than being evaluated on their merits, were filtered through the lens of political hostility. Whatever he does must be greeted with skepticism or condemned.

 

What the Critics Have Wrong About the Iran Conflict | Opinion

March 10, 2026   By Stuart Gottlieb

Adjunct Professor of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University

Perhaps the only thing more remarkable than the joint U.S.-Israeli decapitation strike against the Iranian regime on February 28 is the nature of the criticism of the action. Nearly all opponents claim support for the demise of the bloody-handed Iranian leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, while simultaneously expressing outrage that the operation itself has supposedly violated a litany of laws, norms and other requirements that were necessary to proceed.

The most prominent objections are that President Donald Trump acted without first explaining his objectives; that he failed to secure Congressional authorization or the support of America’s international allies; and that he refused to exhaust diplomacy before choosing military options.

Aggressively questioning the use of military force by any government is healthy and, in a democracy, necessary. And there are always legitimate concerns about the course of any military conflict. But when opposition is more about obfuscating than informing, the process of deliberation and debate becomes tainted by unnecessary partisanship. Indeed, the thinness of the core objections to the Iran operation indicates that the Trump administration is on rather firm ground.

First, the primary objectives of the operation are obvious and reasonable. For nearly 50 years, the Iranian regime has been at war against America and its interests in the region, and over the past decade it had been escalating dramatically. Not only was Tehran moving ahead full steam toward a nuclear weapons capability, it radically increased its support for terror proxies in the region, culminating with the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led massacre in Israel. Even after its nuclear and ballistic missile programs were severely degraded by U.S. and Israeli strikes in June, the regime remained intent on rebuilding all of its bases of power including its nuclear capabilities.

Repeated criticism that the Trump administration hasn’t yet offered a specific “endgame” for the operation misses the point entirely—the only requirement is an Iran no longer able to threaten the region, or beyond. The type of regime that next governs, for example, is of lesser concern.

Second, the notion that the action is “unconstitutional” or “unlawful” betrays a misunderstanding of both the Constitution and historic practice. The original text of the Constitution granted Congress sole power “to make war,” but the final draft replaced “make” with “declare,” recognizing the unique prerogatives of the president (“commander-in-chief”) on national security. Ever since Thomas Jefferson waged “undeclared” war against North African pirates in the Mediterranean, all presidents have claimed such authority. And while the 1973 War Powers Act tried to curb its excesses, the Trump administration met the letter of that law by informing Congressional leaders prior to the strike, and now has 60 days to garner formal approvals.

VIDEO – WHY YOU CAN’T NEGOTIATE WITH IRAN – VICTOR DAVIS HANSON

 

VIDEO

Victor Davis Hanson Explains Why You Can’t Negotiate With Iran – And Why They’re Losing (VIDEO)

By Mike LaChance  March 6, 2926

Conservative scholar and historian Victor Davis Hanson is recovering from a serious illness and is back to comment on world events just in time.

During a recent conversation, Hanson talked about what is happening with Iran and explained why you can’t negotiate with them. Mainly because they live in a fantasy where they believe God is on their side.

He also explained why Trump’s strategy is working and Iran is losing badly.

UNDER BIDEN, THOUSANDS OF ADVERSARIES GIVEN ACCESS TO SENSITIVE US LABS

 

US adversaries made nearly 30K visits to sensitive labs under Biden admin, bombshell data show

By Ryan King   March 5, 2026

Citizens of China, Iran, and Russia made close to 30,000 trips to sensitive American research facilities during the Biden administration, new data show.

Between Sept. 1, 2021, and Aug. 31, 2024, 28,028 Chinese nationals, 304 Iranians, and 1,608 Russians visited laboratories run by the Department of Energy, according to the office of Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa).

“While Iran’s regime chanted ‘Death to America,’ the Biden administration rolled out the red carpet for Iranian foreign nationals to enter our National Labs,” Ernst told The Post.

They also gave entry to thousands of Chinese nationals and hundreds of Russians, who could then access and potentially steal American research.”

The length of the visits ranged from hours to months, with remote access provided in some cases, according to the Department of Energy’s Foreign Access Central Tracking System (FACTS) database.

The Energy Department oversees 17 federally funded laboratories across America.

Under the Unclassified Foreign National Access Program, foreigners from adversarial countries are subject to counterintelligence assessments.

“This process includes, at a minimum, the completion of intelligence indices checks, with additional local counterintelligence vetting conducted when dictated by factors such as the facility being visited, the duration of the visit, and the science and technology involved,” Energy Secretary Chris Wright informed Ernst in a letter.

“Due to Iran’s status as a State Sponsor of Terrorism, all Iranian citizens undergo enhanced counterintelligence review prior to access approval as required by the DOE order.”

Ernst initially sought data on visits from foreign adversaries to US labs in 2024, pointing to a report from the Senate Intelligence Committee that found “approximately 40,000 citizens of foreign countries, including more than 8,000 citizens from China and Russia, were granted access to … premises, information, or technology” in fiscal year 2023.

After COVID-19, we should have learned our lesson about trusting Communist China’s scientists,” she told The Post at the time. “We know our adversaries run sophisticated espionage programs to steal research, we do not need to invite them in.”

HOW KHAMENEI WAS CLOSELY MONITORED BY AMERICAN AND ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE

 

ARTICLE AND VIDEOS 

How American and Israeli intelligence agencies closely monitored Khamenei for months before his assassination

OAN Staff Katherine Mosack and Brooke Mallory     March 3, 2026

Intelligence agencies from the United States and Israel, spearheaded by the CIA, reportedly monitored the now-deceased Iranian Ayatollah Ali Khamenei for months to identify the optimal window for a decisive strike on his Tehran compound.

Khamenei’s tenure as supreme leader, spanning over 36 years, made him the longest-serving head of state in the Middle East at the time of his death.

The operation culminated on Saturday morning when Israeli fighter jets first bombed the complex, killing the 86-year-old Iranian supreme leader along with several family members and dozens of senior Iranian officials — 48 Iranian leaders to be exact.

Although it was a synchronized joint operation, the specific strike that killed Ayatollah Khamenei was carried out by Israeli fighter jets using intelligence provided by the United States.

Nonetheless, the U.S. launched the first wave of the broader campaign, firing over 100 Tomahawk missiles from warships and launching B-2 stealth bombers from the continental U.S. to neutralize Iranian air defenses and missile sites.

The attack was a masterclass in inter-agency cooperation. While the CIA provided the high-fidelity tracking that pinpointed the “daylight window,” the operational success on the ground and in the air relied on three primary Israeli intelligence branches:

  • Mossad: The Mossad was the “boots on the ground” for this mission. Reports from the Financial Times and Times of Israel indicate that the Mossad had successfully embedded assets within Tehran. These operatives provided the final visual verification that Khamenei had entered the compound just minutes before the strike. The agency reportedly leveraged “gray market” routes to smuggle in specialized hardware — including encrypted “software bridges” — to maintain communication with local assets despite the regime’s digital blackouts.
  • Aman (IDF): Aman provided the technical and tactical “jigsaw puzzle” pieces that made the strike possible. Israel’s elite signals intelligence (SIGINT) unit was instrumental in hacking almost all traffic cameras in Tehran to monitor the movements of Khamenei’s security detail in real-time. Aman’s Intelligence Directorate built the “pattern of life” files for the other 48 senior officials killed in the strike, ensuring that the 30 precision-guided bombs dropped by the IAF hit multiple buildings within a 60-second window.
  • The IAF Intelligence Wing: While the Mossad and Aman found the target, the Air Force’s internal intelligence coordinated the flight paths. They worked alongside the U.S. to “blind the blinder,” using electronic warfare platforms to suppress Iranian air defenses so that Israeli F-35s could operate directly over Tehran with “impunity.” IAF intelligence was responsible for the last-minute shift from a “dark-of-night” assault to the 9:40 AM daylight strike, betting correctly that the surprise of a morning attack would catch the leadership before they could retreat to deeper bunkers.
U.S. Agencies Involved
  • The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA): The CIA acted as the primary architect for the “decapitation” phase of the operation. The agency spent over eight months mapping Ayatollah Khamenei’s “pattern of life,” utilizing human assets and advanced behavioral analytics. It was a CIA “high-fidelity” intelligence report that confirmed the Saturday morning meeting, prompting the pivot from a night mission to a daylight strike to catch the leadership above ground.
  • The National Security Agency (NSA): The NSA provided the “digital backbone” for the strike by intercepting the regime’s most secure communications. The NSA successfully cracked the encrypted mobile and radio networks used by the IRGC leadership. This allowed the U.S. and Israel to listen in as the meeting was being scheduled, confirming that Khamenei, the Defense Minister, and the IRGC Chief would all be in the same room. Working with U.S. Cyber Command, the NSA deployed non-kinetic effects to disable Iranian communication towers in the Pasteur Street district just before the missiles hit, ensuring the guards couldn’t call for reinforcements or warn the target.
  • The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA): While the CIA watched the leader, the DIA focused on the regime’s weapons. The DIA provided the “target packages” for the broader operation, identifying over 1,000 strategic sites, including hidden missile silos and naval bases in the Persian Gulf. Following the strike, the DIA has been responsible for confirming the deaths of the 48 regime officials and assessing the degradation of Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities.
  • U.S. Space Command & National Reconnaissance Office: The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) provided 24/7 high-resolution satellite surveillance. This allowed pilots and commanders to see “real-time” movements at the Tehran compound, ensuring the strike hit the specific buildings where the meeting was taking place. Before physical bombs or missiles hit their targets, USSPACECOM, in coordination with U.S. Cyber Command, also launched non-kinetic effects to “blind” the Iranian military.

BARRON TRUMP ON X – HEGSETH -ELITE UNIVERSITIES AND THE MILITARY

 

https://x.com/barrontnews_/status/2027491780527067319?s=43

Mail?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fprofile Images%2F1929214973772693504%2FMeh8zsAz Normal
ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸
⁦‪@BarronTNews_‬⁩
🚨 BREAKING: SecWar Pete Hegseth just ordered the immediate cancellation of all Department of War attendance at elite universities like Yale, Princeton, Columbia, MIT, and Brown.

No more funneling military dollars into institutions that openly sneer at the very warriors pic.x.com/XQgcD1XQDV

2/27/26, 4:11 PM

FBI ON HIGH ALERT

 

Islamic sleeper cells in the U.S. have been a  concern for many years but during the Biden open border policy, it is not known how many Islamists were able to come into our country and could now pose a threat to our country.   Nancy
February 28, 2026

Following President Trump’s strikes on Iranian targets, the FBI has moved quickly to tighten security at home, raising its alert posture nationwide amid concerns about potential retaliation.

FBI Director Kash Patel confirmed Saturday that he placed the bureau’s counterterrorism and intelligence teams on high alert as U.S. operations against Iran continue overseas. “Last night, I instructed our Counterterrorism and intelligence teams to be on high alert and mobilize all assisting security assets needed,” Patel wrote on X. “Our JTTFs throughout the country are working 24/7, as always, to address and disrupt any potential threats to the homeland.”

That is not routine language. It signals a serious shift in posture.

According to a law enforcement source cited by Fox News, such a move typically involves increased surveillance of priority suspects, activation of confidential informants, and a review of technical intelligence collection. In short, the bureau is widening its net to detect and deter any possible threats before they materialize.

While the U.S. military is focused on force protection for troops and assets overseas, Patel emphasized that the FBI remains “at the forefront of deterring attacks here at home.” The bureau’s Joint Terrorism Task Forces across the country are operating around the clock.

This heightened alert comes as tensions with Iran escalate following U.S. strikes. Iran has a history of asymmetric responses, often relying on proxies, cyber operations, or lone actor sympathizers rather than conventional military retaliation against the American homeland. That reality is clearly weighing on federal officials.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said she is “in direct coordination with our federal intelligence and law enforcement partners as we continue to closely monitor and thwart any potential threats to the homeland.” Her statement underscores the interagency effort now underway.

The timing adds another layer of complexity. The alert unfolds during a partial shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security, which could complicate certain administrative or logistical operations. Still, core national security and counterterrorism functions remain active.

Security analysts note that when the United States conducts direct military strikes against a state actor like Iran, especially one with a global network of allies and proxies, it is standard practice to assume some form of retaliatory effort could follow. That does not mean an attack is imminent. It does mean vigilance is necessary.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that President Trump has been in contact with allies in the region following the strikes, signaling diplomatic coordination alongside military and domestic security measures.

For Americans at home, there is no specific public threat warning at this time. But federal authorities are clearly taking no chances. As tensions abroad rise, the focus now shifts to ensuring that any blowback does not land on U.S. soil.

Scroll to Top