RECENT POSTS

BIDEN ADMIN PERSECUTED CHRISTIANS
SUPREME COURT’S RULING AGAINST RACIAL GERRYMANDERING
HUGE WIN IN PENNSYLVANIA FOR ELECTION INTEGRITY
VIDEO – TURKEY SHOULD NOT BE IN NATO
SPACE FORCE-US TO DEPLOY ANTI-MISSILE INTERCEPTORS IN SPACE
SECRET SERVICE – WE ARE AT WAR – BE PREPARED
SUSPECTED WHCD SHOOTER
TRUMP’S IRAN DOCTRINE – A STRATEGY FOR THE HISTORY BOOKS
4 TRAITOROUS REPUBLICANS
UFO RESEARCHER DEAD FROM ‘APPARENT SUICIDE’
2 ARTICLES – ISRAEL’S NAVY

RECOMMENDED

SITES

SUSAN KOKINDA VIDEO -EUROPE, ENGLAND, IRAN AND TRUMP

 

 
A fascinating strategy video by Susan Kokinda   Nancy  
Promethean Action
@PrometheanActn

Trump and Iran are negotiating through Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey, and Pakistan — while the UK, EU, and NATO aren’t even in the room.

breaks down the new diplomatic architecture, Europe’s energy collapse, and why Zelenskyy has a “very bad feeling.”

JACK SMITH SPYING ON KASH PATEL

 

Senators Grassley and Johnson Release FBI Surveillance Subpoena on Kash Patel, Potentially Used for Control Leverage

March 24, 2026  | Sundance

Senators Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson released 30 pages of documents today outlining how the Jack Smith investigation “Arctic Frost” was used to capture records of former Trump administration officials [SEE HERE].

In addition to information showing how Jack Smith was collaborating and strategizing with DC Judge James Boasberg in advance of the subpoena submissions, literally strategizing how best to target Donald Trump, there is something even more interesting in the release.

 

Many people have wondered why FBI Director Kash Patel seems compromised since he took office.  Well, the FBI subpoena into then civilian Kash Patel, highlights the extent of the FBI operation as they gathered background intelligence that could be used for blackmail and leverage over the eventual FBI Director.

 

PLEASE CLICK ON THE LINK ABOVE TO READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE

THE ISLAMIZATION OF BRITAIN

 

  You can listen to the article by clicking on the link.  Nancy

The Islamization of Britain is Almost Complete

British institutions are relentlessly embracing Islam, attacking classic British culture, and turning a blind eye to Islamic crime and antisemitism.

Janet Levy | March 22, 2026

The British Empire was the largest in history. With colonies on every continent, it covered more than a quarter of the earth’s land and governed over a fifth of the world’s population. Besides dominating military, economic, diplomatic, and political affairs, it transformed the world by spreading Western values, customs, and culture, as well as ideas such as individualism, rationalism, capitalism, and modern scientific thought. That influence continues in the educational, legal, and parliamentary systems of many countries.

But Britain is now a shadow of its former self, having allowed its institutions, the media, academia, and the public to be heavily influenced by Islam, which the late Christopher Hitchens described as “the most toxic form that religion can take.” Fashionable deference to Islam—the government, for example, treats even the most innocuous criticism of Islam as “hate speech”—has caused a noticeable shift in power, identity, and influence, and it may not be long before Britain becomes an Islamic state.

The Muslim population is projected to exceed 8% by 2030. There are over 2,000 mosques, more than 85 sharia courts challenge British common law, sharia finance is growing in popularity, halal food is widespread, and the government recognizes Islamic holidays with an enthusiasm that would shame many Muslim countries. Iftars are hosted at the House of Commons, and Ramadan prayers are offered at Windsor Castle, a symbol of Britain’s historical pre-eminence.

For years, public discourse has been filled with discussions about Britain’s Islamization. U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance once joked that Britain might be the first truly Islamic country to acquire nuclear weapons. Elon Musk criticized U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer for ignoring Muslim sex grooming gangs that exploit children and for remaining silent on Pakistani rape gangs when he was Britain’s director of public prosecution. But governments—especially Labour Party governments—have consistently ignored the warning signs and have encouraged Islam by permitting mass migration and giving in to every demand made by Muslim groups.

Examples are plentiful of Britain’s decline into submission to Islam and the replacement of its Western culture by sharia. Guidance documents for schools from Labor-run city councils in northern England warn educators that drawing and music lessons could be considered blasphemous to Islam. The Green Party of England and Wales plans to change school curricula to teach children that it is their moral duty to welcome immigrants. In the name of raising awareness about a religion from another culture, children too young to question their teachers are being brainwashed.

While the authorities go out of their way to accommodate Islam, they have no hesitation about attacking Christianity or being lenient with those who criticize it.

  • Hatun Tash, a Turkish-born British citizen and former Muslim, was arrested twice for preaching Christianity and criticizing the Quran at Hyde Park’s Speakers’ Corner, a stronghold of free speech. Ironically, she was the victim in these incidents and has been stabbed and beaten by Muslims more than once.

PLEASE CLICK ON THE LINK ABOVE TO READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE AND TO ALSO LISTEN TO THE ARTICLE

THOUSANDS OF INELIGIBLE VOTER REGISTRATIONS FOUND

 

Review of 50–60 MILLION Records Uncovers Thousands of Ineligible Registrations Including Non-Citizens Who VOTED — 300,000 DEAD People Still Listed

by Jim Hᴏft  Mar. 21, 2026

Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon has revealed that a massive DOJ review of between 50 and 60 million voter records has uncovered hundreds of thousands of ineligible registrations, including over 300,000 DEAD people still listed as active voters and tens of thousands of non-citizens who have already cast ballots in federal elections.

As The Gateway Pundit has reported extensively, Dhillon’s team has been waging war on dirty voter rolls since President Trump took office.

Back in December 2025, we told you how an initial review of just 47.5 million records found 260,000+ dead voters and thousands of illegals registered to vote.

Now the numbers are even worse, and we’re only looking at a fraction of the states that actually cooperated.

Harmeet Dhillon:
We have run some records for some states. So, I think we’ve run something between 50 and 60 million voter records so far. And, you know, during this president’s tenure, we have found hundreds of thousands of people who shouldn’t be on the voter rolls—people who are dead, people who have moved, and duplicate registrations.

We have also found, separately, noncitizens on the voter rolls. And so now we’re doing our due diligence to identify the extent to which they may or may not have voted.

And sometimes people are enrolled on the voter rolls. We’ve just seen some crazy videos from California that show homeless people being used to sign petitions and register to vote or sign affidavits. You could sign ballots for somebody else and fill them in.

And that’s easy when you have a system where there’s no voter ID, right? Where ballots are being mailed to outdated voting lists.

This is not a fiction or a fantasy. Los Angeles County, in 2017, agreed in a lawsuit with Judicial Watch that there were over 1.1 million people in that county alone who should not have been on the voter rolls.

WATCH:

PLEASE CLICK ON THE LINK ABOVE TO WATCH THE VIDEO AND TO READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE

MIGRANTS SURGE AT U.S. AIRPORTS

As Trump closes the border, unauthorized migrants surge at U.S. airports

By Stephen Dinan  The Washington Times  Tuesday, March 17, 2026

President Trump may have cooled the U.S.-Mexico border, but the latest data shows unauthorized migrants are now surging into America’s interior.

The Department of Homeland Security calls them “inadmissibles,” and they show up at airports and seaports without fully valid paperwork.

Their numbers have more than doubled in recent months, from about 8,500 in August and September to more than 19,000 in January, according to the latest data available.

That is still well below the peak of the Biden era, when Customs and Border Protection would regularly record more than 50,000 inadmissible migrants showing up at airports and hoping to win quick catch-and-release through “parole.”

Analysts at the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse said the surge coincides once again with a major jump in parole.

“When a noncitizen arrives at a port of entry — whether by air, sea, or land — and does not have a visa or other proper documents allowing them to enter the U.S. (an ‘inadmissible’), port authorities need to decide how the person should be handled,” TRAC wrote in an analysis.

Port authorities can put inadmissibles through expedited deportation, serve them notice of a longer deportation court battle, or parole them, which allows them to remain in the U.S. despite lacking a legal visa. That last option is now the most common.

Parolees now comprise a record-breaking 61.5 percent of all inadmissibles,” TRAC said.

Mark Morgan, who served as acting commissioner at CBP during the first Trump administration, said the public data is insufficient to determine what is happening.

“We don’t have enough analysis to tell us if it’s time for concern. But if it continues, and especially if it spreads to other areas, then alarm bells should be going off,” he said.

CHINESE INTERFERENCE IN OUR ELECTIONS?

Remember how those who believed  that there was fraud in the 2020 election were denounced ?  Nancy

Mail?url=https%3A%2F%2Feotrx.substackcdn.com%2Fopen%3Ftoken%3DeyJtIjoiPDIwMjYwMzE3MTU0NDU3LjMuZDdhYzIzY2JmYTYxMzYyMEBtZzIuc3Vic3RhY2suY29tPiIsInUiOjQ1OTM2NTA4LCJyIjoiQ2xhcmtuYUBhb2wuY29tIiwiZCI6Im1nMi5zdWJzdGFjay5jb20iLCJwIjoxOTEyNjE5MDUsInQiOiJuZXdzbGV0dGVyIiwiYSI6ImV2ZXJ5b25lIiwicyI6NzQ2NTgwLCJjIjoicG9zdCIsImYiOnRydWUsInBvc2l0aW9uIjoidG9wIiwiaWF0IjoxNzczNzYyMzA4LCJleHAiOjE3NzYzNTQzMDgsImlzcyI6InB1Yi0wIiwic3ViIjoiZW8ifQ

John Solomon is reporting on previously suppressed information indicating that, as early as 2020, we knew the Chinese were trying to interfere in our elections and that this intelligence was covered up.
͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­͏     ­

 

Jaw-Dropping Clip of Donald Trump Telling Host His Plan for Iran in 1980 Goes Viral! – Israel Unwired

Dave Rubin is exactly right that Donald Trump – back in 1980 – when he was in his 30’s understood what so many across the United States of America understand instinctively – the world does not respect weakness. It really is as simple as that.

Donald Trump – then and now – is in no way a warmonger. But he is most definitely someone willing to give the order to pull the trigger – with one caveat. He refuses to allow the United States of America to get swallowed into a black hole of an endless war.

Remember that Donald Trump came of age during the time of the Vietnam War. Like so many other baby boomers, he was profoundly impacted by that war – whether or not he supported it. The war was a tragedy that shattered much of the image of the United States – both within the United States and across the world.

But Donald Trump does not believe in throwing out the baby with the bathwater. And he is wise enough to know that not every conflict can be solved with surgical strikes – such as the phenomenal raid and decapitation of Maduro in Venezuela.

In truth, President Trump has been a master at both leading the United States and being in tune with the general consensus of what the vast majority of the United States supports – a strong and proud United States that does not get embroiled in foreign conflicts.

 

TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME: THE DANGER OF HATRED CLOUDING PERCEPTION

 

‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’: The Danger of Hatred Clouding Perception

Dr. Majid Rafizadeh, is a political scientist, Harvard-educated analyst, and board member of Harvard International Review. He has authored several books on the US foreign policy. He can be reached at dr.rafizadeh@post.harvard.edu

March 14, 2026 
  • In the end, the greatest danger of this mindset is not simply unfair criticism of a president. The deeper problem is that it weakens the ability of society to confront serious threats. When political hatred becomes so intense that it overrides basic judgment, it becomes difficult to distinguish between legitimate criticism and reflexive opposition. Perception of reality itself is broken.
  • At a moment when the world faces overwhelming security challenges – such as from China – currently developing new deadly pathogens for biowarfare and autonomous robots programmed to kill — and authoritarian regimes that continue to threaten both their own populations and what they regard as their enemies — denial and blindness carry serious risks.
  • If political discourse becomes so polarized that people can no longer recognize the nature of regimes that repress their own citizens and openly threaten the United States and the Free World, the problem is far larger than any single president. It becomes a crisis that can only be addressed when people step outside their partisan bubbles and confront reality as it truly is.
  • If one steps back from the daily noise of partisan bickering and looks at the broader picture in the United States today, some media outlets and political figures appear so consumed by hostility toward the current president that they seem incapable of evaluating events rationally.Their reaction to almost anything he does appears automatic and reflexive. This situation, often described as “Trump Derangement Syndrome,” has reached such an extreme level that at times these voices appear to be siding — whether intentionally or not — with America’s enemies such as the Chinese Communist Party, or the Iranian regime, which, since its inception in 1979, has openly been at war with the United States and for decades has been described by American officials across both political parties as the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism 39 years in a row.
  • The result is a political discourse that seems disconnected from what is right or wrong, but simply whether something was done by President Donald J. Trump.This disagreement has gone far beyond normal political discord. In any healthy democracy, political leaders and policies can and should be debated and criticized. What we are witnessing now in some corners of the political and media landscape, however, appears to have crossed over into something closer to emotional obsession than rational debate. It is as if the guiding principle has become: if Trump does something, it must automatically be wrong. The logic and context behind the action become irrelevant. Instead of asking whether confronting a hostile regime might serve American interests or international security, the reaction becomes instant opposition, regardless of the circumstances or the stakes involved.
  • The Iranian regime, for instance, has for decades openly defined itself through hostility toward the United States and its allies. Its leaders have repeatedly chanted “Death to America” (“The Great Satan”) and “Death to Israel” (“The Little Satan”), slogans that are not merely rhetorical flourishes but actual central elements of the regime’s ideological identity. Iranian leaders, starting with the founder of the Islamic Republic, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, have openly called for the obliteration of Israel and have supported armed groups across the Middle East that target both Israelis and Americans.Since 1984, the US government — under both Republican and Democrat administrations — has officially designated Iran as a State Sponsor of Terrorism for its support of terrorist organizations such as Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, Hamas, and the Houthis; its involvement in attacks across the region and attempted attacks abroad, including involvement in the 9/11 attacks and at least two attempted assassinations on Trump, as well as targeting senior US officials for assasination in his first term.
  • Iran’s regime has killed countless Americans, and continues to pursue policies designed to weaken American influence in the Middle East. It is a regime that has repeatedly demonstrated hostility toward the United States and its allies.Yet when Trump took a hard stance against Tehran, instead of focusing on the nature of the Iranian regime itself, some critics appeared to focus exclusively on the identity of the president who was confronting it. The issue became less about Iran and more about Trump. His actions, rather than being evaluated on their merits, were filtered through the lens of political hostility. Whatever he does must be greeted with skepticism or condemned.

 

What the Critics Have Wrong About the Iran Conflict | Opinion

March 10, 2026   By Stuart Gottlieb

Adjunct Professor of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University

Perhaps the only thing more remarkable than the joint U.S.-Israeli decapitation strike against the Iranian regime on February 28 is the nature of the criticism of the action. Nearly all opponents claim support for the demise of the bloody-handed Iranian leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, while simultaneously expressing outrage that the operation itself has supposedly violated a litany of laws, norms and other requirements that were necessary to proceed.

The most prominent objections are that President Donald Trump acted without first explaining his objectives; that he failed to secure Congressional authorization or the support of America’s international allies; and that he refused to exhaust diplomacy before choosing military options.

Aggressively questioning the use of military force by any government is healthy and, in a democracy, necessary. And there are always legitimate concerns about the course of any military conflict. But when opposition is more about obfuscating than informing, the process of deliberation and debate becomes tainted by unnecessary partisanship. Indeed, the thinness of the core objections to the Iran operation indicates that the Trump administration is on rather firm ground.

First, the primary objectives of the operation are obvious and reasonable. For nearly 50 years, the Iranian regime has been at war against America and its interests in the region, and over the past decade it had been escalating dramatically. Not only was Tehran moving ahead full steam toward a nuclear weapons capability, it radically increased its support for terror proxies in the region, culminating with the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led massacre in Israel. Even after its nuclear and ballistic missile programs were severely degraded by U.S. and Israeli strikes in June, the regime remained intent on rebuilding all of its bases of power including its nuclear capabilities.

Repeated criticism that the Trump administration hasn’t yet offered a specific “endgame” for the operation misses the point entirely—the only requirement is an Iran no longer able to threaten the region, or beyond. The type of regime that next governs, for example, is of lesser concern.

Second, the notion that the action is “unconstitutional” or “unlawful” betrays a misunderstanding of both the Constitution and historic practice. The original text of the Constitution granted Congress sole power “to make war,” but the final draft replaced “make” with “declare,” recognizing the unique prerogatives of the president (“commander-in-chief”) on national security. Ever since Thomas Jefferson waged “undeclared” war against North African pirates in the Mediterranean, all presidents have claimed such authority. And while the 1973 War Powers Act tried to curb its excesses, the Trump administration met the letter of that law by informing Congressional leaders prior to the strike, and now has 60 days to garner formal approvals.

Scroll to Top